Domestic Violence and California Family Court

How California family courts may consider domestic violence when making decisions about custody and visitation.

Domestic Violence and California Family Court

California family courts make decisions about divorce, legal and physical custody, and visitation (also called “parenting time”). When there are concerns about domestic violence, the court is expected to pay close attention to safety, especially the safety and well-being of children.

The Role of California Family Court

Family court is the part of the California court system that handles issues such as:

• Divorce or legal separation – ending or changing a legal relationship between spouses or partners
• Legal custody – who has the right to make major decisions for a child (for example, about school, health care, and religion)
• Physical custody – where a child lives and who provides day-to-day care
• Visitation/parenting time – when and how the child spends time with each parent

When domestic violence is a concern, those issues can become more complex. The court may need more information and may use additional safety measures before making or changing orders.

How Domestic Violence Concerns Reach the Court

Concerns about domestic violence can come to the court’s attention in several ways, including:

• Information in court papers filed during divorce, custody, or visitation cases
• Requests for a domestic violence restraining order
• Police reports or criminal case records shared with the family court
• Statements made in court by parties, lawyers, or sometimes witnesses
• Reports or recommendations from court-connected professionals (for example, mediators, evaluators, or guardians ad litem, if used)

People involved in the case can usually share information about past or current abuse, including threats, patterns of control, and safety concerns for the child or themselves.

Best Interests of the Child and Safety

In California, custody and visitation decisions are generally based on what the court believes is in the child’s “best interests.” This idea includes many factors, but in plain language it usually means:

• Keeping the child as safe as possible
• Supporting the child’s emotional and physical well-being
• Looking at each parent’s ability to care for the child
• Considering whether the child has been exposed to violence, fear, or unsafe situations

Domestic violence is usually taken seriously when the court thinks about a child’s best interests. Even if the child was not directly hit or threatened, living with fear or tension can be considered harmful. The court may look at whether one parent has used control, intimidation, or physical harm against the other parent or other household members.

Past Abuse, Restraining Orders, and Criminal Records

Past incidents can be important to California family court, especially if there is a pattern or if the abuse was serious. The court may look at:

• Past physical, emotional, sexual, or financial abuse in the relationship
• Any existing or past domestic violence restraining orders, emergency protective orders, or criminal protective orders
• Police reports, hospital or clinic records, and photographs, if provided
• Criminal charges or convictions involving violence, threats, stalking, harassment, or child abuse

The court might consider not only single incidents, but also ongoing behaviour. For example, repeated threats, controlling access to money, or isolating someone from family and friends may be relevant to understanding risk and safety needs.

Legal Custody, Physical Custody, and Visitation When There Is Abuse

Domestic violence concerns can affect how the court looks at both legal and physical custody, and how it structures parenting time. Depending on the facts, a judge may decide that:

• One parent will have most or all decision-making power (legal custody)
• The child will primarily live with one parent for stability and safety
• Parenting time will be more limited or more closely structured for the parent who caused harm

Courts generally try to support healthy relationships between children and parents when it is safe to do so. When the court believes there is a real risk of harm, it can adjust custody and visitation orders to reduce that risk.

Safety-Focused Tools the Court May Use

California family courts have several tools they may use to support safety while still allowing contact in some form. Examples can include:

Supervised Visitation

The court may order that a parent’s time with the child be supervised by a neutral adult or at a visitation center. Supervision may be used when there are concerns about violence, threats, substance use, or safety in general.

Safe Exchange Locations

To reduce direct contact between adults, a court may order that child exchanges happen:

• At a neutral public location
• Through a supervised visitation center
• With the help of a third person acceptable to the court

This can lower the chance of conflict and help protect children from witnessing arguments or intimidation.

Limitations on Contact Between Adults

Some orders may limit how and when the adults communicate, particularly where there is a history of harassment, stalking, or threats. For example, the court might:

• Restrict communication to written tools such as email or parenting apps
• Limit conversations to topics about the children
• Set clear times or methods for communication

In some situations, a restraining order may prohibit direct contact altogether, while still allowing for child-related communication through specific channels or intermediaries set out in court orders.

Bringing Safety Concerns to the Judge

Sharing information clearly can help the court better understand safety needs. People in a case might:

• Describe specific behaviours, threats, and incidents in written declarations or testimony
• Submit documents such as messages, call logs, or photos, if allowed by court rules
• Explain how the situation affects the child’s sleep, school, health, or sense of safety
• Let the court know about any restraining orders, prior cases, or police involvement

It can be helpful to focus on patterns, safety impacts, and the child’s needs rather than only on labels or diagnoses.

Why Talking With a California Family Law Attorney Can Help

California family law has many rules about custody, visitation, and domestic violence, and these rules are applied differently depending on the facts of each case. A California family law attorney who has experience with domestic violence can:

• Explain how the law generally treats abuse in custody and visitation disputes
• Help identify safety-focused options to request from the court
• Prepare paperwork and organize information about abuse and safety concerns
• Speak on a person’s behalf in court, when possible
• Coordinate with criminal cases, restraining orders, or child protection matters, if those exist

Speaking with an attorney is not a promise of any particular result, but it can help someone understand what the court may consider and what realistic options may exist for their situation.

Some people also find it helpful to connect with domestic violence advocates or support services, who may offer safety planning, system navigation, and emotional support alongside legal help. Additional support options across the United States can be found through resources listed at DV.Support.

Recommended Articles

• Staying Safer on Phones, Email, and Social Media
• Safety Planning if You Live in Ontario
• Safety Considerations in British Columbia
• Safety Options in Alberta
• Planning for Safety in Saskatchewan